In
week 7 we looked into participatory media cultures, and in particular, one that
continues to have a direct effect on food culture – the social media website Urbanspoon.
This post will aim on expanding on the capabilities of Urbanspoon as a
participatory culture by identifying some key concepts imbued in its
interactive and connected nature, and to analyse how its collaborative processes
have developed a culture of everyday critics, food photographers and
opinionated foodies.
Urbanspoon's coverage is global. Many cities, states and towns have there own home page localised
to the area containing a list of restaurants, corresponding reviews, pictures
and the infamous ‘talk of the town’ sections – the most reviewed, blogged about
and discussed restaurants – A.K.A. ‘the popular kids’ in the schoolyard of
cuisine.
Joining the website is relatively easy, all you need to do is create a profile – forming an online representation of self, a username and a corresponding email and off you go into the maelstrom of like-minded individuals. Joining is only necessary if you wish to participate in the websites content.
Joining the website is relatively easy, all you need to do is create a profile – forming an online representation of self, a username and a corresponding email and off you go into the maelstrom of like-minded individuals. Joining is only necessary if you wish to participate in the websites content.
Urbanspoon
acts as a hub – collating reviews from other blogs and websites, whilst
granting users the ability to upload their own. The collaboration of review
scores is then developed into a median percentage rating for each restaurant, giving
users a collaborative power akin to a ‘reviewing democracy’ – to embrace and
promote their favourite eateries, and denounce those that leave them queasy and
dissatisfied.
So
what makes Urbanspoon so popular? Delwiche and Jacobs Henderson quote Jenkins
in stating “a participatory culture is also one in which members believe their
contributions matter, and feel some degree of social connection with one
another (at least they care what other people think about what they have
created)” (2012, p. 3). In essence, Urbanspoon’s success expands on the
popularity of the pre-existent food culture imbued in a city. Though the
websites capabilities flourish as it embraces the social connection of food
culture in a different platform – one that is interactive and constantly
connected.
I
can’t remember the last time I went to a restaurant without checking it on
Urbanspoon first. I, like many, am a food ‘nerd’ and like to “seek guidance
from collaboratively updated websites” (Delwiche and Jacobs Henderson, 2012,
pp. 3-4) on how I will spend my hard earned dollars (given the sparse nature of
currency to a student).
Urbanspoon,
and its collaboration of like-minded individuals, provide me with the reviews;
the pictures and the menus I require to plan my minimum wage spend, but also
interestingly provide a more specific section for ‘cheap eats’.
It
is this umbrella premise that makes participatory cultures successful. Although
Urbanspoon is specific to restaurant culture – users diversify its content
based on their demographic. This ranges from analysing ‘cheap eats’ to the more
expensive ‘Fine Dining’ section’s three hat establishments.
Urbanspoon’s nature of
interactivity puts individuals in partial control of online content; as Darley
(2000, p. 156) states as “taking a leading role in what occurs, given the means
to control – at least in part”. Although Darley discusses interactivity
regarding videogames, it too can be experienced through social media. The ability
to interact creates a sense of entitlement and a form of ownership for users
over their interests. Those who enjoyed a particular dish at Cumulus Inc. want
to write about their ‘distinguished’ tastes and share their views into developing
a “knowledge culture” (Delwiche
and Jacobs Henderson, 2012, p. 4).
“These
knowledge cultures have become an integral part of our lives; they function as
prosthetic extensions of our nervous system and we often feel crippled when our
access to these networks is curtailed. It is hard to believe that, for the most
of recorded history, human beings were unable to instantly find answers to
questions such as “How long can I safely store cooked chicken in the
refrigerator?”
- Delwiche and Jacobs Henderson, 2012, p. 4
Al Deen et. al. state that “online
social interactions fundamentally differ form face-to-face interactions in
offline social networks. Online social networking typically offers
opportunities for expression that are less restrictive” (2011, p.3). The ability
to construct a representation to hide behind has produced the ability for users
to be more honest without scrutiny, and praise – putting the
customers/reviewers and prosumers into a position of power. Anybody could be a
reviewer and have some say in deciding if your restaurant is popular enough to
be considered as the ‘Talk of the town’. Interactivity implies to intervene in a
meaningful way – having a form of control of content uploaded and displayed on
the website.
![]() |
| The Urbanspoon mo |
“Social
media are increasingly becoming mobile. They are contributing to new mindsets
and skill sets, fostering a culture of participation unrestricted by schedules
and locations. This mobility promotes a continual activity of interaction in
which we are immersed and involved, all the time.”
(Greenfield
2006)
The
connectivity experienced through mobile devices is especially relevant when you
consider physical nature of food. A picture can be taken within minutes of
being prepared by a chef, and a review can be completed just after a meal. This
makes for a seamless process that has begun to naturalise itself into modern
day dining. There isn’t a need to transport around cameras, laptops and
notepads when devices such as the iPhone, iPad or Android phone or tablet can
complete all tasks via a wireless connection directly to the website the review
will be published on.
Giaccardi
(2012, p. 4) claims participatory culture built via social media is not limited
to its online interactivity and virtuality; “it is also interwoven with
physical objects, places and activities that are augmented and enhanced with social
data and connectivity.”
Restaurants
can flourish with the right reviews, and others face demise with a bad few. Social media
applications such as Urbanspoon don’t create this shift of power, though they
allow it to be more accessible through participatory cultures, ensuring every
customer is as important as the last to a restaurant – You’re only as good as
the last meal. Any mobile phone wielding, selfie-taking hipster could
supplement a restaurants success or aid in its poor online representation.
Giaccardi
(2012, p.4) quotes Leadbeater stating, “In this more plural and collaborative
culture, the boundaries between amateur and professional, consumer and
producer, grassroots and mainstream are breached, if not erased”. The sheer
number of ‘social media keyboard warriors’ could see you taking information
from the wrong sources. You can’t be expecting that the user ‘JoeBlogs69’ has
the technical knowhow to understand the subtle touches and techniques required
to complete a classic French Jus, or that ‘Maccasfan74’ will definitely be
approaching the regional Italian fare on offer with an open mind. This is both
a positive and negative implication of participatory media cultures. On one
hand, unparalleled honesty from a user not experienced with reviews or familiar
with a particular cuisine could present as genuine, though the credibility (or
lack thereof) presented in a judgment could also be the reason you missed out
on trying something or someplace completely different. We can’t forget about the
‘Trolls’ - Nothing stops a biased, publicity-seeking restaurateur from jumping
on Urbanspoon and collating a review that makes a restaurant look like the food
messiah. Thus is the nature of the Internet.
The affects of participatory
cultures have seen a shift in listening to the critics to listening to the
publics. Participatory cultures are continually democratising industries.
Though this does not take away from the validity of restaurant reviews in The
Age’s Epicure, the 2014 Good Food Guide, or San Pelligrino’s ‘Top 50’,
Urbanspoon offers a more localized, informal and user-friendly approach to the
whole eating out process.
![]() |
| Acclaimed Chef & Restauranteur Jaques Reymond |

The Age’s Good Food Guide continues to set the official benchmark by offering coveted ‘chefs-hat’ awards to restaurants, though Urbanspoon’s ability to bring together like-minded individuals and to spread the renown of smaller establishments has only enhanced the explosion of contemporary cuisine in our generation. Its interactive and connected nature promotes discussion, and ensures that notoriety is not just down to the mutually exclusive big names or powerhouses of the industry.
Urbanspoon ensures every preference and every budget can be matched to a restaurant, whether your taste is the $285 degustation at the three-chef-hat Jacques Reymond or the $11 Burger with the Lot from Melbourne icon Andrew’s Hamburgers. Urbanspoon caters for all.
Thank you for reading – Michael.
Reference
List:
Al-Deen, .N, Hana, .S
& Hendricks J.A 2011, Social
Media: Usage and Impact, Lexington
Books, retrieved September 7th 2013, http://www.deakin.eblib.com.au.ezproxy-f.deakin.edu.au/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=795614
Delwiche, A., Jacobs Henderson, J. 2012, The Participatory Cultures Handbook, Taylor & Francis, retrieved October 4th 2013, <http://deakin.eblib.com.au.ezproxy-m.deakin.edu.au/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1024648>
Giaccardi, E. 2012, Heritage & Social Media: Understanding heritage in a participatory culture, Taylor & Francis. retreived October 6th 2013, <http://deakin.eblib.com.au.ezproxy-m.deakin.edu.au/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=988002>
Raessens, J. 2005, ‘Computer games as participatory media culture’, Handbook of
Raessens, J. 2005, ‘Computer games as participatory media culture’, Handbook of
Computer
Game Studies, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, pp. 373-388










